30-day founding beta
Go from whatto why.
You know where users drop. Not why. Sightspool asks the people who dropped—one real answer from a real user beats a month of dashboards—and records what you expected, so you never investigate the same question twice.
Live product readA-027
Sightspool engine
User growthObserved → next read
OPEN NOW · NO CARD REQUIRED
- Product change
- PostHog
- Customer voice
- GitHub
- Support
QuestionCan new users tell who owns setup?
OutcomeMore teams complete setup without ownership handoffs.
- Product question
- Desired outcome
- Assumption
- Relevant evidence
- Client action
- Observed outcome
03Falsifiable belief: new users can tell who owns setup.
00Before the loop
We begin by making your product measurable.
A product can only improve when you can see how it is actually being used. Sightspool discovers the key events that must be tracked before analytics, research or AI can make a responsible claim.
A useful product read needs events that show…
- Where people begin.
- Where they reach value.
- Where they drop off.
01Connected context
Your product is full of signals. We connect the dots.
- Events
- Funnels
- Cohorts
- Acquisition outcomes
- Approved surveys
- Revenue
- Plans
- Payments
- Account status
- Commits
- Pull requests
- Changed routes
- Release context
- Key flows
- Interface states
- Friction points
- Completion paths
- User intent
- Effort
- Account context
- Friction moments
- Live audio interviews
- Final transcripts
- Customer language
- Approved responses
Sightspool shows what is already observable, which events are missing and why each one is needed—before treating the product as measurable.
- 88% UTM coverage
- Aggregate · read-only
- Association, not causation
Already installed PostHog?Sightspool audits the events you already have, proposes only the gaps a real product question needs and can compare UTM groups against one named product outcome. The read is aggregate and directional—never ROAS or ad-platform control. Without PostHog, the open-source SDK provides the same measurement path.
02Proposed assumptions
Then surface what the product is counting on.
Once the critical path is measurable, Sightspool proposes what you, your product or your agent may be assuming about users. You choose which assumptions enter the loop.
- A-021New users understand the setup.Proposed · waiting for your call
- A-022They reach value without help.Proposed · waiting for your call
- A-023They return after the first useful run.Proposed · waiting for your call
03Human expertise, on tap
The agent knows when to escalate. You decide when a human steps in.
Sightspool keeps the loop moving on its own. When evidence conflicts, stakes rise or a question cannot be settled responsibly, it sends you an escalation with the question, proof and downside attached. Human review is available, never imposed.
- 01Agent reaches a limitA decision needs judgement
The evidence conflicts, the risk is consequential or the customer question remains unresolved.
- 02Client gets the full hand-offThe reason to escalate stays attached
You receive the assumption, evidence, uncertainty and proposed next move together.
- 03Human review, on requestSenior UX judgement is there when you want it
Request one focused review—or continue with your own decision.
Human assurance
Senior judgement when the stakes demand it.
The agent knows its limits. When evidence conflicts, confidence is low or the decision is consequential, it escalates—so the call is never made in the dark.
One focused UX review included
“There has never been a better time to build. But building is only the beginning. The real advantage is understanding your users deeply—then shaping the product around what they need.”
04Governed research
Go deep with the right cohort. Not everyone.
When a product question needs the why, Sightspool can run a consented live audio interview or text conversation from an approved guide—alongside targeted surveys and bounded behavioural reads.
One question. One cohort. One bounded study.
The moderator follows the approved guide in real time. Voice is optional, text remains available, and only the final transcript can enter evidence.
- 01Purpose
- Settle one committed product assumption
- 02Cohort
- Only the people relevant to that question
- 03Method
- Live audio or text interview, targeted survey or behavioural read
- 04Consent
- Research first; microphone and voice processing separately
- 05Evidence
- Final transcript only—provisional live words are not proof
- 06Window
- A defined collection period with an explicit stop condition
05The derivation
From assumption to outcome. With the proof gate visible.
The big picture is not generated in one leap. It is assembled through a reviewable sequence, and each transition has a reason.
- 01
Assumption
Name what the product is counting on.
- 02
Context
Map the sources that can speak to it.
- 03
Proof gate
Keep zero, missing and small-sample evidence distinct.
- 04
UX review
Bring in senior judgement only when the stakes need it.
- 05
Action
You accept, amend, challenge or dismiss the next move.
- 06
Outcome
Return after implementation and write back what happened.
A previous verdict stays in history. A relevant product change starts a fresh evidence read—it never rewrites the past.
07Visible governance
No proof, no post.
Sightspool owns the source-backed read, its uncertainty and the proposed action. You own the roadmap, delivery and final decision. Targeted surveys, moderated interviews and deeper research only run against an approved purpose, cohort and consent path.
- 01
No proof
No post - 02
No known signal
No measured read - 03
No approval
No action - 04
No approved cohort
No targeted survey - 05
No assumption
No deep capture - 06
No voice consent
No audio capture - 07
No resolution
Escalate
30Day founding beta
Bring one real product question. Or let us find it.
Bring the question already on your mind—or connect your sources and let Sightspool surface the assumptions worth testing. Then make one unaided attempt and help shape a more responsible product-intelligence loop.
Join the founding beta